IQmonitor tool
-
-
42°E Nigcomsat 1R C-Band
Beacon(s): 3694.14R, 3696.84L
my Lnb (Panorama-13K) is (-3MHz) from other Lnb
https://www.satbeams.com/satellites?norad=38014
confirmed with IQmonitor-Pro High.Resolution.Spectra
-
Hallo Strannik
Nach der Bericht von satesco von 34,5West mit 64 APSK
Habe ich mit meiner 6983 TBS karte ( ist nicht 64 APSK fähig ) auch mit IQMonitor pro probiert .
Hier sind die Ergebnis .
Manche Constellation sehen ganz gut aus .
Erstaunlicherweise ( z.B. 11588 V,20090) die bei satesco als 64APSK DVB s2X eingegeben ist
ist meinerseite als 16APSK DVBs2 gefunden und zwar mit 98% Sicherheit .
Wäre es 64 APSK DVBs2X konnte höchswahrscheinlich die 6983 es nicht lesen .
Ich gehe davon aus das meine Ergbenis richtig ist ,oder ?
According to satesco's report from 34.5West with 64 APSK
I tried with my 6983 TBS card ( is not 64 APSK capable ) also with IQMonitor .
Here are the results .
Some Constellations look quite good .
Surprisingly ( e.g. 11588 V,20090 ) which is entered at satesco as 64APSK DVB s2X
is found on my site as 16APSK DVBs2 with 98% certainty.
If it was 64 APSK DVBs2X, the 6983 would most likely not be able to read it.
I assume that my result is correct, right?
Согласно отчету satesco с 34.5West с 64 APSK
Я пробовал с моей картой 6983 TBS (не поддерживает 64 APSK) и с IQMonitor.
Вот результаты.
Некоторые созвездия выглядят очень хорошо.
Удивительно (например, 11588 V,20090), который введен в satesco как 64APSK DVB s2X
найден на моем сайте как 16APSK DVBs2 с 98% уверенностью.
Если бы это был 64 APSK DVBs2X, 6983, скорее всего, не смог бы его прочитать.
Я предполагаю, что мой результат верен, верно?
-
Recht eindrucksvolle Signalbilder.
Ich stell mir gerade die Frage, ob Caribbeam 11110 V 30000 3/4 8PSK mit 11099 H 45000 3/4 16 APSK zu tun hat.
Was 11588 V betrifft, gebe ich dir grundsätzlich recht.
Könnte es nicht auch sein, dass ähnliche FEC einfach anders interpretiert wird.
Beispiel: 25/36 = 0,69 2/3 = 0,66
Es gibt halt derzeit zu wenig echte S2X-Transponder, dass man dies auch überprüfen könnte.
Quite impressive signal images.
I am wondering if Caribbeam 11110 V 30000 3/4 8PSK has anything to do with 11099 H 45000 3/4 16 APSK.
As for 11588 V, I basically agree with you.
Couldn't it also be that similar FEC is simply interpreted differently.
Example: 25/36 = 0.69 2/3 = 0.66
There are currently too few real S2X transponders that one could also check this.
-
Stephan, ich grüße dich!
Ich bin beeindruckt von Ihren neuesten Ergebnissen, die Sie kürzlich veröffentlicht haben. Die Konstellationen sind super und die Modulationsvorhersage ist absolut genau und zuverlässig.
-
According to satesco's report from 34.5West with 64 APSK
RE: 34.5°W Intelsat 35e
Hello stephan
some of DATA_DVB-S2X transponders works with both standard DVB-S2X and DVB-S2 at the same time .
some of them works with DVB-S2X standard only .
-
-
0.90m VS 1.80m (Test N°02) Ku-Band @ 21.6°E
I modified a little the polar-mount of 1.80m dish -making distance equal between dish and polar .
Tools :
*0.90m (perforated dish ...winds appears a lot here in my area ! ) with televes single Lnb ;
1.80m with Inverto Black Ultra single Lnb (both are offset dishes) also with my favorite Card TBS5927
*DiSEQc switch with 04 ports (I don't Know if this will effect !)
*Crasyscan Version 1.0.2.168 with Streamreder Version 1.2.4.119 (RF-scan + Blindscan2)
*IQmonitor Pro Version 1.0.1..3 with Streamreder Version 1.2.4.109 (Ultra-spectrum (RF + H.R.Spectra)
*the is a slight difference in signal between day and night
1-Vertical polarity :
0.90m ; SNR_avr=11.2dB ,LM=4.4dB
1.80m ; SNR_avr=13.5dB ,LM=6.2dB ; +2.3dB in SNR_avr ; + 1.8dB in LM
.................................
-
0.90m VS 1.80m (Test N°02) Ku-Band @ 21.6°E
2-Horizontal polarity :
0.90m ; SNR_avr=11.0dB ,LM=4.6dB
1.80m ; SNR_avr=13.3dB ,LM=7.5dB ; +2.3dB in SNR_avr ; + 2.9dB in LM
I guess I need more modification in this 1.80m polar-mount ! at least this time the results are better !
-
auf 28,2 Ost
ein Vergleich mit IQMonitor Pro zwischen 1,80m und 1,20m .
das UK Beam ist zu dieser Zeit ( 13:00 bis 15:00) ziemlich gut für meinen Standort
on 28.2 East
a comparison with IQMonitor Pro between 1.80m and 1.20m .
the UK beam is pretty good for my location at this time (13:00 to 15:00).
на 28.2 востоке
Сравнение с IQMonitor Pro между 1,80 м и 1,20 м .
Луч "UK" довольно хорош для моего местоположения в это время (с 13:00 до 15:00).
-
-
on 28.2 East
a comparison with IQMonitor Pro between 1.80m and 1.20m.
the UK beam is pretty good for my location at this time (13:00 to 15:00).
Thank you very much Stephan
your last scan help me a lot to understand the difference
* the Average increase of signal is about 3dB in your case (between 1.20m and 1.80m dish) but this is not the most important thing!
what is the most important is:
* The effect of using a large dish appears at low-signal transponders, which will be very higher after using a larger dish. (Higher with 5dB + for example)
As for the transponders that have a good signal, their signal does not rise much after using a larger dish (only 2dB higher than before)
-
Thank you very much Stephan
your last scan help me a lot to understand the difference
* the Average increase of signal is about 3dB in your case (between 1.20m and 1.80m dish) but this is not the most important thing!
what is the most important is:
* The effect of using a large dish appears at low-signal transponders, which will be very higher after using a larger dish. (Higher with 5dB + for example)
As for the transponders that have a good signal, their signal does not rise much after using a larger dish (only 2dB higher than before)
Hallo Flie ,
sehr schöne Studium ,
Deine Tafel ist sehr gut ,
hat wahrscheinlich ein bisschen Zeit gebraucht.
very beautiful study ,
Your board is very good ,
probably took a little time
Очень хорошее исследование,
Ваша картина очень хороша,
вероятно, потребовалось немного времени
-
IQmonitor Pro 1.0.1.4 has been adapted for the new StreamReader interface.
Now the program works with both its minor versions and StreamReader 1.2.4.119.
A long and thorough testing of IQmonitor Pro 1.0.1.4 will be required, since most of the important functions of the program have been modified.
If someone wants to take part in testing the program, write here, I will send you a beta version
-
Klar möchte ich mitmachen ,ob ich denn auch darf?
-
Sehr positiver erster Test.
mit dem kleinen sr und dem neuen StreamReader 1.2.4.119
geht alles einwandfrei.
Very positive first test.
with the small sr and the new StreamReader 1.2.4.119
everything works flawlessly.
Очень положительный первый тест.
с маленьким sr и новым StreamReader 1.2.4.119
все работает безупречно.
-
-
-
Now the program works with both its minor versions and StreamReader 1.2.4.119.
thank you very much Strannik
It will be pleasure to test the new version and repeat all previous test too!
until then, I will post my last two tests with the previous version
best regards
flow.
0.90m VS 1.80m (Test N ° 02) Ku-Band @ 21.6 ° E
* This time with TBS6903X, Horizontal polarity, IQmonitor pro DVB-S2X_mode
Test Nf doesn't work with TBS6903X!
so I reset this value manually "LNB_NF = 0.74" dB in IQmonitor_Pro.INI
-
0.90m VS 1.80m (Test N ° 02) Ku-Band @ 21.6 ° E
TBS6903X, Vertical polarity
IQmonitor pro TBS6983_mode:
12524, H, 65453 very hard to look !!!, locked only when I change steps parametres
Jetzt mitmachen!
Sie haben noch kein Benutzerkonto auf unserer Seite? Registrieren Sie sich kostenlos und nehmen Sie an unserer Community teil!