Posts by antoniopev

the features that I would like to be included in my instrument are
S2X
greater sensitivity in auto S/R because if you find a TP with low S/R the instrument does not measure it, to measure it I created Fake TP with low S/R and in this case it is fine
a more performing battery
the possibility of having the measurements and the spectrum in a single screen since the display is 9 inches
for the rest I find it very good

I use professional products from the time of the analog system 1990 to the present day I currently use a Rover 900 plus
and from 2003 to today I also use satellite cards
the 1 SS2 then the SS2 hd > tbs 6925 > tbs 6522 > 6903 X
I find the cards very interesting but to find the satellites the use of the Rover is clearly better, later I find the tp with the TBS

my signal

for me this carrier is not a problem, in fact the signal is very strong

It doesn't seem like a great response from the chip manufacturer, also because the cost of this card is not popular and therefore a statement of this type seems to me to understand that if you want it's fine like this, if you don't want it's fine anyway, a classic statement from someone who has a monopoly of any kind
thanks

if it is the heatsink and not the fan then it is like mine a V2
only in C band it has this problem while in KU the marker is in the center of the carrier
but I do not understand the difference in the scan time between this image and my tbs which in my case is clearly longer
what is the variable ??

I see that others have the same problem with the 6903 X in C band, the marker is completely out of the signal
is this the V2 version?
thanks

Merry Christmas to all members and visitors of the forum

I will wait for any developments of the drivers for this card, in the meantime I got a 6983 that when it arrives will send to the deserved rest the 6925 that I have been using since 2012
unfortunately I have not found any 6903 even used
now I have renewed my TBS cards, 6522/6903X/ and when the 6983 arrives
Merry Christmas
thanks

as I anticipated not being able to return the 6903X I installed it again
I saw the video of the crazy on 23.5 east and I copied the parameters on my card
these are the very disappointing results compared to the video, and I do not understand the difference in performance between my card and yours
I would like to understand where the difference is!!!
my card is the V2 without cooling fan
thanks

it is very rare to find active channels from this slot, in the past something has passed, yesterday evening I also tried to scan the satellite and I noticed a large decrease in active signals, before they were much more numerous, even in the VH part you found some active data transponders but now they have been deactivated

I wanted to return the card but I'm out of time for the return, I had it for a while then I waited a bit to install it and time passed, consequently in the next few days I will reinstall it and I will try to make the most of its great potential, I will surely ask you for some more info or help!!
I also asked what is the minimum S/R value that the 6903X accepts?
thanks to those who helped me

tomorrow I'll uninstall it and then return it
in my pc I have a 6925 and a 6522
and I thought this one had fewer problems
I knew about the slowness of the blin scan but that's not a problem
compared to the 6925 the tuner is slightly lower in sensitivity
in crazy in C band it does what it wants (I'm referring to the marker)
I should be in time to return the device
for its high cost they could have done much more in TBS

I don't agree with what you wrote, in the photos I put 2 transponders whose S/R is high so it occupies the entire bandwidth of the transponder itself, so the marker must be in the center of the transponder
if instead there was a transponder inside which there are several frequencies with very low S/R then what you wrote could be true, but in this case NO because the S/R is 27500 and 34000
but the strange thing is that in the KU band the marker falls in the center, in the C band the marker falls where it wants
this evening I did a blindscan speed test
3800/4200 vertical and horizontal on the 40 west found 29 TP in 23 minutes with 6903 X
3800/4200 vertical and horizontal always on the 40 west found 30 tp
in 6 minutes with 6925

thanks

there is still this problem that the tp marker is not centered, the frequency is correct but the marker is shifted to the left
any solution?

downloaded the file, now the scan is regular from 3800 to 4200, now I have a clean installation and the CS
seems to work well, always in its slow scanning but it scans normally
thanks for your availability
thanks

unfortunately the capacity is very poor in the software environment, I temporarily deleted the crazy from the PC and wanted to do a clean installation, but I can't find the crazy installation file!!!
I only find a folder of a few bytes in many versions!!
where can I find the entire installation file?
or if you already have an updated crazy file ready you can upload it to some link and send it to me with a PM
so I start off on the same level with an already working file, otherwise I'll be here asking again!!!

after making changes the situation is the same
I ask again
who owns a 6903 X in scanning with CS + EBS pro in C band the scanning starts from 4200 towards 3800 or does it only happen to me
thanks

I tried both with eps pro and crazy but with both the scan starts from 4200 towards 3800, I changed in streamreader as you wrote above but nothing changed